diff mbox series

[v2,1/7] arm64: Unconditionally call unflatten_device_tree()

Message ID 20240130004508.1700335-2-sboyd@kernel.org
State New
Headers show
Series [v2,1/7] arm64: Unconditionally call unflatten_device_tree() | expand

Commit Message

Stephen Boyd Jan. 30, 2024, 12:45 a.m. UTC
Call this function unconditionally so that we can populate an empty DTB
on platforms that don't boot with a firmware provided or builtin DTB.
Override 'initial_boot_params' to NULL when ACPI is in use but the
bootloader has loaded a DTB so that we don't allow both ACPI and DT to
be used during boot. If there isn't a valid initial_boot_params dtb then
unflatten_device_tree() returns early so this is fine.

Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>
Cc: Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
---
 arch/arm64/kernel/setup.c | 7 +++++--
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

Comments

Stephen Boyd Jan. 31, 2024, 10:59 p.m. UTC | #1
Quoting Rob Herring (2024-01-31 12:54:05)
> On Mon, Jan 29, 2024 at 04:45:00PM -0800, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > Call this function unconditionally so that we can populate an empty DTB
> > on platforms that don't boot with a firmware provided or builtin DTB.
> > Override 'initial_boot_params' to NULL when ACPI is in use but the
> > bootloader has loaded a DTB so that we don't allow both ACPI and DT to
> > be used during boot. If there isn't a valid initial_boot_params dtb then
> > unflatten_device_tree() returns early so this is fine.
> > 
> > Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>
> > Cc: Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com>
> > Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
> > Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
> > Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
> > Cc: <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
> > ---
> >  arch/arm64/kernel/setup.c | 7 +++++--
> >  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/setup.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/setup.c
> > index 417a8a86b2db..ffb1942724ae 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/setup.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/setup.c
> > @@ -351,8 +351,11 @@ void __init __no_sanitize_address setup_arch(char **cmdline_p)
> >       /* Parse the ACPI tables for possible boot-time configuration */
> >       acpi_boot_table_init();
> >  
> > -     if (acpi_disabled)
> > -             unflatten_device_tree();
> > +     /* Don't use the FDT from boot if ACPI is in use */
> > +     if (!acpi_disabled)
> > +             initial_boot_params = NULL;
> 
> I still think this is a problem for kexec. See 
> of_kexec_alloc_and_setup_fdt(). You see it uses initial_boot_params. At 
> first glance it looks like it would just write out everything we need. 
> But for UEFI boot, I think we need all the chosen properties like 
> linux,uefi-mmap-start preserved from the current boot for the next 
> kernel we kexec.

Ok, got it.

> 
> I think you'll have to check acpi_disabled in unflatten_device_tree() 
> and unflatten the empty tree leaving initial_boot_params alone. That 
> means our FDT and unflattened tree will be different DTs, but I think 
> that's fine.

It's sort of scary given that 'initial_boot_params' is an exported
global. Maybe that should be hidden away and accessed with a function
instead so that this mismatch doesn't break something later on?
Rob Herring (Arm) Feb. 2, 2024, 4:30 p.m. UTC | #2
On Wed, Jan 31, 2024 at 02:59:53PM -0800, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> Quoting Rob Herring (2024-01-31 12:54:05)
> > On Mon, Jan 29, 2024 at 04:45:00PM -0800, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > > Call this function unconditionally so that we can populate an empty DTB
> > > on platforms that don't boot with a firmware provided or builtin DTB.
> > > Override 'initial_boot_params' to NULL when ACPI is in use but the
> > > bootloader has loaded a DTB so that we don't allow both ACPI and DT to
> > > be used during boot. If there isn't a valid initial_boot_params dtb then
> > > unflatten_device_tree() returns early so this is fine.
> > > 
> > > Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>
> > > Cc: Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com>
> > > Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
> > > Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
> > > Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
> > > Cc: <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
> > > Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
> > > ---
> > >  arch/arm64/kernel/setup.c | 7 +++++--
> > >  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/setup.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/setup.c
> > > index 417a8a86b2db..ffb1942724ae 100644
> > > --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/setup.c
> > > +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/setup.c
> > > @@ -351,8 +351,11 @@ void __init __no_sanitize_address setup_arch(char **cmdline_p)
> > >       /* Parse the ACPI tables for possible boot-time configuration */
> > >       acpi_boot_table_init();
> > >  
> > > -     if (acpi_disabled)
> > > -             unflatten_device_tree();
> > > +     /* Don't use the FDT from boot if ACPI is in use */
> > > +     if (!acpi_disabled)
> > > +             initial_boot_params = NULL;
> > 
> > I still think this is a problem for kexec. See 
> > of_kexec_alloc_and_setup_fdt(). You see it uses initial_boot_params. At 
> > first glance it looks like it would just write out everything we need. 
> > But for UEFI boot, I think we need all the chosen properties like 
> > linux,uefi-mmap-start preserved from the current boot for the next 
> > kernel we kexec.
> 
> Ok, got it.
> 
> > 
> > I think you'll have to check acpi_disabled in unflatten_device_tree() 
> > and unflatten the empty tree leaving initial_boot_params alone. That 
> > means our FDT and unflattened tree will be different DTs, but I think 
> > that's fine.
> 
> It's sort of scary given that 'initial_boot_params' is an exported
> global. Maybe that should be hidden away and accessed with a function
> instead so that this mismatch doesn't break something later on?

What you see now is after I did a pass of minimizing the number of 
users.

BTW, I've now got another use for unconditionally calling 
unflatten_device_tree() with this[1].

Rob

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240201194653.GA1328565-robh@kernel.org/
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/setup.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/setup.c
index 417a8a86b2db..ffb1942724ae 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/setup.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/setup.c
@@ -351,8 +351,11 @@  void __init __no_sanitize_address setup_arch(char **cmdline_p)
 	/* Parse the ACPI tables for possible boot-time configuration */
 	acpi_boot_table_init();
 
-	if (acpi_disabled)
-		unflatten_device_tree();
+	/* Don't use the FDT from boot if ACPI is in use */
+	if (!acpi_disabled)
+		initial_boot_params = NULL;
+
+	unflatten_device_tree();
 
 	bootmem_init();