From patchwork Tue Apr 30 11:41:34 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Wolfram Sang X-Patchwork-Id: 794068 Received: from mail.zeus03.de (www.zeus03.de [194.117.254.33]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 81312132808 for ; Tue, 30 Apr 2024 11:41:52 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=194.117.254.33 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1714477314; cv=none; b=o/9VkmWfcZRt0pd1MTAeuNIv4PHbXvm/B39ymSD8kSY+ZZH8EAsIOiJK4ftOu/W5G6zZdbu9RLOvgYKDybt9IJr7vGndXqh3ufkmH1F5aydmx1vqLEH3gjT7BGq5UsC24S8Kst6dcksurTc3npv91jlKiT/B8dlhXiAVdcSb3yM= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1714477314; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Zmt3mvVxR8/6eumvAZBZCb07XHV0s9S1SjrKXTEDONg=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version; b=MqgMARY5cnR5zTLwUBvH04KJFntYehJoVoCxgwfM0O1gzBkOa3lEiytNJxfm2EcpbOKzxznc/hLJOFnu+gAcE4N8tlvT8dPvA/Uenq35BB3mTjJv14x1l5jbafMcb93I7VRxgn3XpEHBxiodQGylYmRc9altdUfY8K771TBqah4= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=sang-engineering.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=sang-engineering.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sang-engineering.com header.i=@sang-engineering.com header.b=PFBQx0Lc; arc=none smtp.client-ip=194.117.254.33 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=sang-engineering.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=sang-engineering.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sang-engineering.com header.i=@sang-engineering.com header.b="PFBQx0Lc" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= sang-engineering.com; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; s=k1; bh=MInQ7pWHBpWvz99BT9rM0W6PRLzDwOBqZlUusbB0xrA=; b=PFBQx0 LcjP1lOQmgur5cxsF4MmLzW62BCayntJYN4KnDO2hx/4ZDpKZii/2uEIF9Sscfxn LbychW4mVAebCRENjb91HKlc8I3v1lzbj+e664RMGpIh7RHb/yyn5uHfi1BllnY8 JKFCp8aftvut1CRRGWDsxpTUmuBseaPoSfVXXFLoqZZQ+mGSUi1g+/6vBEU++D5o sxLMOR67vLtttJ/NnYJ5tpJqUsoVq445SdbggPqlfECvUV3w75FLmmvVxB0HMGiQ UhQrbU0OMXVgiLlqDLuEdKTe4sMVkcRzdJtNvqBy39RJugUQ6ha7TzI/reM5RYNW RnMBlBWupT4CC4fA== Received: (qmail 2617804 invoked from network); 30 Apr 2024 13:41:45 +0200 Received: by mail.zeus03.de with ESMTPSA (TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 encrypted, authenticated); 30 Apr 2024 13:41:45 +0200 X-UD-Smtp-Session: l3s3148p1@2Qu+2k4Xtuhehhrb From: Wolfram Sang To: linux-spi@vger.kernel.org Cc: Wolfram Sang , Mark Brown , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH v2 2/8] spi: fsl-lpspi: use 'time_left' variable with wait_for_completion_timeout() Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2024 13:41:34 +0200 Message-ID: <20240430114142.28551-3-wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.43.0 In-Reply-To: <20240430114142.28551-1-wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com> References: <20240430114142.28551-1-wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-spi@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 There is a confusing pattern in the kernel to use a variable named 'timeout' to store the result of wait_for_completion_timeout() causing patterns like: timeout = wait_for_completion_timeout(...) if (!timeout) return -ETIMEDOUT; with all kinds of permutations. Use 'time_left' as a variable to make the code self explaining. Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang --- drivers/spi/spi-fsl-lpspi.c | 14 +++++++------- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-fsl-lpspi.c b/drivers/spi/spi-fsl-lpspi.c index 92a662d1b55c..aa5ed254be46 100644 --- a/drivers/spi/spi-fsl-lpspi.c +++ b/drivers/spi/spi-fsl-lpspi.c @@ -553,7 +553,7 @@ static int fsl_lpspi_dma_transfer(struct spi_controller *controller, { struct dma_async_tx_descriptor *desc_tx, *desc_rx; unsigned long transfer_timeout; - unsigned long timeout; + unsigned long time_left; struct sg_table *tx = &transfer->tx_sg, *rx = &transfer->rx_sg; int ret; @@ -594,9 +594,9 @@ static int fsl_lpspi_dma_transfer(struct spi_controller *controller, transfer->len); /* Wait eDMA to finish the data transfer.*/ - timeout = wait_for_completion_timeout(&fsl_lpspi->dma_tx_completion, - transfer_timeout); - if (!timeout) { + time_left = wait_for_completion_timeout(&fsl_lpspi->dma_tx_completion, + transfer_timeout); + if (!time_left) { dev_err(fsl_lpspi->dev, "I/O Error in DMA TX\n"); dmaengine_terminate_all(controller->dma_tx); dmaengine_terminate_all(controller->dma_rx); @@ -604,9 +604,9 @@ static int fsl_lpspi_dma_transfer(struct spi_controller *controller, return -ETIMEDOUT; } - timeout = wait_for_completion_timeout(&fsl_lpspi->dma_rx_completion, - transfer_timeout); - if (!timeout) { + time_left = wait_for_completion_timeout(&fsl_lpspi->dma_rx_completion, + transfer_timeout); + if (!time_left) { dev_err(fsl_lpspi->dev, "I/O Error in DMA RX\n"); dmaengine_terminate_all(controller->dma_tx); dmaengine_terminate_all(controller->dma_rx);